[Klone-users] Re: "Segmentation fault" in kloned

Steven Van Ingelgem steven at vaningelgem.be
Fri Dec 5 16:20:15 EST 2008


At least it'd be more nice to clean up your stuff once you're done :-).



2008/12/5 thomas fossati <tho at koanlogic.com>

>
> Hi Steven, that's the embedded file system scum.  No need to worry about
> it.
>
> ciao, t.
>
> On Dec 5, 2008, at 9:23 PM, Steven Van Ingelgem wrote:
>
> More detailed information:
>
>
> ==15424== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 23 from 1)
> ==15424== malloc/free: in use at exit: 2,256 bytes in 112 blocks.
> ==15424== malloc/free: 15,476 allocs, 15,364 frees, 6,641,755 bytes
> allocated.
> ==15424== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v
> ==15424== searching for pointers to 112 not-freed blocks.
> ==15424== checked 124,560 bytes.
> ==15424==
> ==15424== 2,248 (2,008 direct, 240 indirect) bytes in 99 blocks are
> definitely lost in loss record 3 of 3
> ==15424==    at 0x401C6CA: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:279)
> ==15424==    by 0x8090D32: u_zalloc (memory.c:63)
> ==15424==    by 0x808E1B3: u_hmap_o_new (hmap.c:1072)
> ==15424==    by 0x80748FC: emb_register (emb.c:69)
> ==15424==    by 0x807D92A: module_init_3c03a85447646e5d5127801337173786
> (pg_3c03a85447646e5d5127801337173786.c:67)
> ==15424==    by 0x80793D0: do_register (register.c:22)
> ==15424==    by 0x80793BD: register_pages (register.c:9)
> ==15424==    by 0x80746FF: emb_init (emb.c:32)
> ==15424==    by 0x805072D: app_init (main.c:96)
> ==15424==    by 0x8050DF4: main (entry.c:397)
> ==15424==
> ==15424== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==15424==    definitely lost: 2,008 bytes in 99 blocks.
> ==15424==    indirectly lost: 240 bytes in 12 blocks.
> ==15424==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
> ==15424==    still reachable: 8 bytes in 1 blocks.
> ==15424==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
> ==15424== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not
> shown.
> ==15424== To see them, rerun with: --show-reachable=yes
>
>
> 2008/12/5 Steven Van Ingelgem <steven at vaningelgem.be>
>
>> Seems that did the trick ;-)
>>
>> Still:
>> ==9064== LEAK SUMMARY:
>> ==9064==    definitely lost: 2,248 bytes in 111 blocks.
>> ==9064==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
>> ==9064==    still reachable: 8 bytes in 1 blocks.
>> ==9064==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Klone-users mailing list
> Klone-users at koanlogic.com
> http://koanlogic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klone-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://koanlogic.com/pipermail/klone-users/attachments/20081205/a8c0c6e6/attachment.htm


More information about the klone-users mailing list